Professional exploration hub
From learning to read to choosing to read.
Many programmes help children learn how to read. We are studying the next problem: once children can read, will they choose to read when nobody assigns it?
For literacy specialists, librarians, teachers, NGOs, researchers, volunteer coordinators, publishers and public teams working on different parts of the same reading problem.
6
Practitioner pathways
4
Small test models
1
Field paper outline
5
Collaboration stages
Positioning
A shared problem, not a sales pitch
We are not trying to replace phonics, specialist intervention, teachers, libraries, storybooks, reading volunteers or school reading programmes. The question here is narrower and complementary: how can children be supported to use reading voluntarily, explore wider topics and build sustained attention?
Schools and literacy programmes teach children how to read. Libraries provide access to books. Volunteers provide human encouragement. readA3 supplies personalised, current and diverse material that gives children a reason to read voluntarily.
Pathways
Choose the conversation closest to your work
Literacy and intervention teams
How do children transfer improving reading skills into everyday voluntary reading?
Volunteer reading organisations
Could high-interest nonfiction make sessions easier to prepare and more engaging?
Libraries and community programmes
Can take-home materials support access, inclusion and family participation?
Schools and school leaders
How might topic choice support reading culture and student agency?
Researchers and evaluators
What can be measured without turning leisure reading into another task?
Funders and content partners
How could access, localisation or content quality be supported responsibly?
The reading engagement ecosystem
Ability → Access → Interest → Choice → Habit → Identity
Existing programmes often address ability and access. readA3 is positioned mainly around interest, choice and habit: personalised, age-appropriate and diverse reading material that children may want to select and return to.
Start by helping us think better
The first request is professional insight. Where are our assumptions weak? Which children might benefit, and which might not? What would make interest-led newspapers useful, culturally relevant and realistic in your setting?